由于此商品库存有限,请在下单后15分钟之内支付完成,手慢无哦!
100%刮中券,最高50元无敌券,券有效期7天
活动自2017年6月2日上线,敬请关注云钻刮券活动规则更新。
如活动受政府机关指令需要停止举办的,或活动遭受严重网络攻击需暂停举办的,或者系统故障导致的其它意外问题,苏宁无需为此承担赔偿或者进行补偿。
正版 民间融资的刑法规制及司法现状(英文版) 韩阳著 上海三联书
¥ ×1
PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1 CHANGES IN CHINAS PRIVATE FINANCING MODELS AND THE CONCERNING REGULATIONS
А.THE ANCENT "HEHUI" MODEL IN CHINA
B.OVERALL PATHS AND REGULATIONSFOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF PRIVATE FINANCING IN CHINA
CHAPTER 2 ESTABLISHMENTS FOR ILLEGAL PUBLIC DEPOSIT ABSORBING AND FUND-RAISING FRAUD
A.PONZI SCHEME AND ILLEGAL FUND-RAISING
B.LEGISLATIONS FOR ILLEGAL PUBLICDEPOSIT ABSORBING AND FUND-RAISING FRAUD IN CHINA
1.A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
2.STIPULATIONS FOR ILLEGAL PUBLIC DEPOSIT ABSORBING
3.REGULATIONS FOR FUND- RAISING FRAUD
C.A BRIEF SUMMARY: HIGHLYCONVERGENT REQUIREMENTS FOR CRIMINAL ELEMENTS OF THE TWO CHARGES PROOF RULES FOR IDENTIFICATION OF
CHAPTER 3 THE PURPOSE OF "ILLEGAL POSSESSION" PUARTHER BLUR THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN TWO CRIMES
A.LEGISLATIVE AND JUDICIAL ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE PROOF FOR THE PURPOSE OF "ILLEGAL POSSESSION" IN FUND-RAISING CASES
B.THE SIGNIFICANCE OF YING WUS CASE
C.JUDICIAL PRACTICE AFTER YING WU
1.YIMIN DU FUND-RAISING FRAUD CASE
2.OTHER TYPICAL CASES PUBLISHED BY THE SPC
3.ANALYSIS FOR THE GUIDING CASE RELEASED BY THE SPP
D.COMMENTS ON THE PROOF MODE FOR “ILLEGAL POSSESSION” PURPOSE
CHAPTER 4 DATA ANALYSIS: THE ADJUDICATION ATTITUDE AND TREND FOR ILLEGAL FUND-RAISING CASES
A.ANALYSIS FOR DATA COMING FROMCJO AND OTHER DATABASES
1.DATA OF ADJUDICATIONS ASTO ILLEGAL PUBLIC DEPOSIT ABSORBING
2.DATA OF ADJUDICATIONS AS TOFUND-RAISING FRAUD
3.DATA ANALYSIS
a.OVERALL TREND FOR THE ADJUDICATIONS
b.ANALYSIS FOR THE AREA DISTRIBUTIONS OF CASES
c.OTHER ISSUES SEEN FROM THE DATA
B.DATA RELEASED IN THE OVERNMENT WORK REPORTS BY SPC AND SPP OVER THE YEARS
C.DATA FROM OTHER SOURCES
CHAPTER 5 THE INFLUENCE OF INVESTORS LEGAL STATUS DETERMINATION AND REMEDY ON JUDICIAL CONVICTION ATTITUDE IN ILLEGAL FUND RAISING CASES
A.LITIGATION STATUS OF COMMON INVESTORS
B.THE SCOPE OF THE ACCOMPLICE
C.THE DIFFERENT AMOUNT CALCULATION FOR FUNDS RAISED BASED ON DIFFERENT INVESTORS LEGAL STATUS
1.CALCULATION OF THE AMOUNT OF FUND RAISED IN CASES OF FUND-RAISING FRAUD
2.CALCULATION OF THE AMOUNTOF FUNDS RAISED IN CASES OF ILLEGAL PUBLIC DEPOSIT ABSORBING
3.THE AMOUNT NOT TO BE CALCULATED
D.THE FURTHER STRENGTHENED PROSECUTION AND JUDICIAL SLANTED ATTITUDE TOWARDS ILLEGAL PUBLIC DEPOSIT ABSORBING BY THE DIFFICULT ECOVERY AND COMPENSATION PROCEDURES
1.THE IMPACT OF "CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRIOR TO CIVIL PROCEDURE" PRINCIPLE ON INVESTORS CLAIMS
2.THE PRACTICAL EFFECT OF RECOVERY AND COMPENSATION
CONCLUSION
HAN, Yang (韩阳), Professor of law, Beijing International Studies University(北京第二外国语学院). Senior research fellow of Beijing Research Institute for International Service Trade and Cultural Trade (首都靠前服务贸易与文化贸易研究基地). Council member of China Criminal Procedure Law Research Association. Ph.D in criminal procedure and justice, China University of Political Science and Law. Post-doctoral researcher at Chinese Academy of So Sciences (2007-2010).Visiting scholar, Université Montesquieu - Bordeaux IV (2007); visiting scholar, school of law, University of Oregon (2017-2018). Titled with Beijing Youth Top Talent (2013-2015).
一本研究民间融资的刑法规制及司法现状的专业书稿。
本书介绍了民间融资刑法规制及司法现状。其中,第一章介绍我国民间融资的发展历程,以及政府对民间融资的态度变迁。第二章分析非法吸收公共存款和集资诈骗这两个高度胶着的犯罪构成和立法及司法界定,分析其混同状态的成因及存在原因--共同维护金融业的高强度限控。第三章分析非法吸收公共存款罪和集资诈骗罪的区别--“非法占有”目的--的证成方式,展现现有证成方式对这两个罪名之间界限一步模糊的司法实践状态。第四章通过数据分析展现我国历年非法集资案件括非法吸收公众存款案件和集资诈骗案件的走势,从中可以看出民间融资的风险以及犯罪演化的风险和规模,并分析司法裁判的态度和走势。第五章详细分析出现上述定罪走势的原因和影响要素,比如投资人法律地位的认定、共犯的界定范围、投资人地位对集资数额认定的影响以及集资款返还的困难对定罪态度的影响。
亲,大宗购物请点击企业用户渠道>小苏的服务会更贴心!
亲,很抱歉,您购买的宝贝销售异常火爆让小苏措手不及,请稍后再试~
非常抱歉,您前期未参加预订活动,
无法支付尾款哦!
抱歉,您暂无任性付资格