考研英语听力口语复试(6合一) [正版]2024考研英语一阅读理解专项训练100篇新题型模拟题 搭考研历年真题试卷语法与

         店铺公告

  为保障消费者合理购买需求及公平交易机会，避免因非生活消费目的的购买货囤积商品，抬价转售等违法行为发生，店铺有权对异常订单不发货且不进行赔付。异常订单：包括但不限于相同用户ID批量下单，同一用户（指不同用户ID，存在相同/临近/虚构收货地址，或相同联系号码，收件人，同账户付款人等情形的）批量下单（一次性大于5本），以及其他非消费目的的交易订单。

温馨提示：请务必当着快递员面开箱验货，如发现破损，请立即拍照拒收，如验货有问题请及时联系在线客服处理，（如开箱验货时发现破损，所产生运费由我司承担，一经签收即为货物完好，如果您未开箱验货，一切损失就需要由买家承担，所以请买家一定要仔细验货），

关于退货运费：对于下单后且物流已发货货品在途的状态下，原则上均不接受退货申请，如顾客原因退货需要承担来回运费，如因产品质量问题（非破损问题）可在签收后，联系在线客服。

  本店存在书、古旧书、收藏书、二手书等特殊商品，因受采购成本限制,可能高于定价销售，明码标价，介意者勿拍!

1.书籍因稀缺可能导致售价高于定价,图书实际定价参见下方详情内基本信息,请买家看清楚且明确后再拍，避免价格争议!

2.店铺无纸质均开具电子，请联系客服开具电子版

2023考研英语一阅读理解Part B 100篇，适用对象：

基础薄弱的考研英语一考生；直接做考研英语一阅读真题有困难的考生；需要加强考研英语一阅读理解B节训练的考生；想要提高考研英语一阅读分数的考生。

推荐理由：
1.严格按照新版考研英语一考试大纲要求编写；
2.分题型突破考研英语一阅读理解B节题型；
3.考研英语一阅读理解B节解析详尽，所有阅读训练均配备全文翻译、难词注释，全面扫除阅读理解障碍；
4.按题型总结考研英语一阅读理解B节的解题技巧，帮助考生提高答题速度和答题正确率；
5.选材与考研英语一阅读理解B节真题同源，命题思路和难度与真题高度一致，备考更有效，不做无用功。
6.配套视频课，助力考生科学备考。

1.考研英语一阅读理解B节题型介绍；

2.考研英语一阅读理解B节大纲样题及解析，含语段填空题+段落排序题+匹配题（信息匹配和小标题匹配）；
3.考研英语一阅读理解B节解题基础——英语语篇常识；
4.考研英语一阅读理解B节7大实用解题技巧总结；
5.考研英语一阅读理解B节语段填空题48篇；
6.考研英语一阅读理解B节排序题30篇；
7.考研英语一阅读理解B节匹配题22篇；
8. 考研英语一阅读理解B节解题技巧视频课。

第一章 考研英语一阅读理解B节应试指南

  第一节 考研英语一阅读理解B节题型介绍和大纲样题
    一、考试题型
    二、大纲样题
  第二节 考研英语一阅读理解B节解题基础：英语语篇常识
    视频课
一、常见英语篇章的结构特征
    二、句子、段落的信息结构
    三、句子之间的衔接手段
    四、句子、段落语义逻辑关系
  第三节 考研英语一阅读理解B节7大实用解题技巧
    视频课
    技巧1利用词汇衔接原则解题
    技巧2利用代词线索解题
    技巧3利用时间、数字等线索定位
    技巧4利用“总-分”结构解题
    技巧5利用平行对称结构解题
    技巧6概括片面的选项常可排除
    技巧7干扰项常添加无关信息
第二章 考研英语一阅读理解B节语段填空题48篇
  Test 1~ Test 48
第三章 考研英语一阅读理解B节排序题30篇
  Test 49~ Test 78
第四章 考研英语一阅读理解B节匹配题22篇
  Test 79~Test 100

精彩书摘
Test 51
[A] Punit Shah, a researcher at King’s College London, investigated how the perception of internal bodily sensations is related to emotion and how this may, in turn, be linked to how we make decisions. First, Shah gave a group of typical adults a gambling task to measure their susceptibility to the framing effect. They were later asked to close their eyes and count their heartbeats to measure how well they monitored internal sensations. Their emotional awareness was also measured using a questionnaire. Shah discovered that people who were good at monitoring their heartbeat—people who“followed their heart”—were most guided by emotion and particularly susceptible to the framing effect.
[B] The research demonstrates that“following your heart”is related to complex decision-making, which builds on recent work showing that heartbeat perception is linked to survival in the financial markets. However, it also suggests that listening to your heart and being in touch with your emotions—usually seen as positive things—may lead to decisions that are not so rational.
[C] Decisions are based on the way choices are framed. This is because people use emotion when making decisions, leading to some options feeling more desirable than others. For example, when given￡50, we are more likely to gamble the money if we stand to lose￡30 than if we are going to keep￡20.
[D] But what about people with poor emotional awareness and difficulties monitoring their heartbeat? Research has shown that these things are impaired in people with alexithymia, otherwise known as“emotional blindness.”As emotional blindness is more common in people with autism, Shah tested a group of adults diagnosed with this condition. Replicating previous research, people with autism showed a smaller framing effect. It was found that people with autism were able to monitor their heartbeat just as well as people without autism, but there was no relationship between how well they did this, or emotional awareness, and their susceptibility to the framing effect.
[E] Although both options are mathematically equivalent, the thought of losing money evokes a powerful emotional response and we are more likely to gamble to try to avoid losing money. This cognitive bias, first described by the psychologist Daniel Kahneman in the 1980s, is known as the“framing effect.”Despite this phenomenon being well documented, scientists are still trying to understand why our emotions have such a powerful influence on decision making.
[F] These findings add to evidence showing that people with autism think differently to typical people. Although this is related to the difficulties they experience in social situations, this different way of thinking may sometimes be advantageous in situations where it is it better to follow your head and not your heart.
[G] This indicates that people with autism use a different strategy when making decisions. Instead of using intuition and emotion like people without autism, they were not following their heart and don’t use emotional information to guide their decisions. Instead, they viewed differently framed, but numerically equivalent, options more rationally than typical people. So they gambled just as much as non-autistic people, but did so using the numerical information instead of making decisions based on how those numbers made them feel.

1.      →  2.     →   A    →  3.      →  4.      →   B    →  5.