返回首页
苏宁会员
购物车 0
易付宝
手机苏宁

服务体验

店铺评分与同行业相比

用户评价:----

物流时效:----

售后服务:----

  • 服务承诺: 正品保障
  • 公司名称:
  • 所 在 地:
本店所有商品

  • [醉染正版]外教社 第二语言习得概论 埃利斯 上海外语教育出版社 牛津应用语言学 语言学 语言学文库 语言研究 语言学研
  • 本店商品限购一件,多拍不予发货,感谢理解!
    • 作者: 无著
    • 出版社: 上海外语教育出版社
    送至
  • 由""直接销售和发货,并提供售后服务
  • 加入购物车 购买电子书
    服务

    看了又看

    商品预定流程:

    查看大图
    /
    ×

    苏宁商家

    商家:
    醉染图书旗舰店
    联系:
    • 商品

    • 服务

    • 物流

    搜索店内商品

    商品参数
    • 作者: 无著
    • 出版社:上海外语教育出版社
    • ISBN:9784539981682
    • 版权提供:上海外语教育出版社

                   店铺公告

     

    为保障消费者合理购买需求及公平交易机会,避免因非生活消费目的的购买货囤积商品,抬价转售等违法行为发生,店铺有权对异常订单不发货且不进行赔付。异常订单:包括但不限于相同用户ID批量下单,同一用户(指不同用户ID,存在相同/临近/虚构收货地址,或相同联系号码,收件人,同账户付款人等情形的)批量下单(一次性大于5本),以及其他非消费目的的交易订单。

    温馨提示:请务必当着快递员面开箱验货,如发现破损,请立即拍照拒收,如验货有问题请及时联系在线客服处理,(如开箱验货时发现破损,所产生运费由我司承担,一经签收即为货物完好,如果您未开箱验货,一切损失就需要由买家承担,所以请买家一定要仔细验货),

    关于退货运费:对于下单后且物流已发货货品在途的状态下,原则上均不接受退货申请,如顾客原因退货需要承担来回运费,如因产品质量问题(非破损问题)可在签收后,联系在线客服。

     

    产品展示
    基本信息
    图书名称:
     第二语言习得概论
    作 者:
     埃利斯
    定价:
     21.00
    ISBN号:
     9787810465786
    出版社:
     上海外语教育出版社
    开本:
     32
    装帧:
     平装
    出版日期:
     1999-4-1
    印刷日期:
     1999-4-1
    编辑推荐
    《第二语言习得概论》也可供对语言熟练程度测试等方面感兴趣的应用语言学研究人员参考。
    内容介绍
    《第二语言习得概论》的目的是通过对语言学习者的语言及其形成过程进行讲座来帮助教师把这种模糊的、无意识实施的理论变成明确的、有意识地贯彻的理论。《第二语言习得概论》主要是针对两种读者而设计的:一是涉此领域、希望QM了解第二语言习得研究概况的学生;二是从事第二语言习得研究、希望QM掌握第二语言习得研究动态的教师。
    作者介绍
     
    目录
    1 Key issues in Second Language Acquisition
    2 The role of the first language
    3 Interlanguage and the naturalroute of development
    4 Variability in interlanguage
    5 Individual learner differences and Second Language Acquisition
    6 Input,interaction,and Second Language Acquisition
    7 Learner strategies
    8 The Universal Hypothesis and Second Language Acquisition
    9 The role of formal instruction in Second Language
    10 Theories of Second Language Acquisition
    Conclusion
    Glossary
    References
    Indes
    在线试读部分章节
    it was in fact degenerate, as Chomsky claimed. Empirical studieswere able to show that the mother's speech was remarkably wellformed, containing few ungrammatical utterances or sentence frag-ments. Furthermore this speech was characterized by a number offormal adjustments in comparison to speech used in adult-adultconversations. Snow(1976)lists a number of these: a lower meanlength of utterance, the use of sentences with a limited range of grammatical relations, few subordinate and co-ordinate construaions,more simple sentences,the occurrence of tutorial questions (i,e.questions to which the mother already knows the answer),and,overall, a high level of redundancy. There are also adjustments inpronunciation. Sachs 1977)shows that mothers tune the pitch,intonation, and rhythm to the perceptive sensitivity of the child. Theseadjustments were considered to constitute a special use of language orregister, known as motberese.
    2 The functions of 'motherese'Given that mothers do tune their speech in the ways described above,the question arises of what purposes motherese serves. Ferguson(1977)suggests that there are three main functions:(1)an aid tocommunication,(2)a language teaching aid, and(3)a socializationfunction. It is the former, however, that motivates motherese.Mothers seek to communicate with their children, and this leads themto simplify their speech in order to facilitate the exchange ofmeanings. Mothers pay little attention to the formal correctness oftheir children's speech, but instead attend to the social appropriate-ness of their utterances. Brown(1977)describes the primarymotivation as 'to communicate, to understand and to be understood,to keep two minds focused on the same topic'. Thus if motherese alsoserves to teach language and to socialize the child into the culture ofthe parents, it does so only indirectly as offshoots of the attempt tocommunicate.
    3 The basis of adjustments made by mothersAnother question concerns how mothers determine the nature and theextent of the modifications which are needed. Gleason and Weintraub(1978) suggest that parents have a general idea of their children'slinguistic ability, particularly their ability to understand, but they lackan accurate knowledge of what specific linguistic features theirchildren have mastered. Parents may internalize a model of a 'typical'child of a given age and then adjust their speech upwards anddownwards on the basis of feedback from an individual child. Ofcruaal importance, therefore, is the extent to which the childcomprebends what is said to him and the extent to which he signalshis comprehension or lack of comprehension to his caretaker.Thisconclusion is supported by Cross (1977), who found little evidencethat mothers were able to monitor either their own or their children's Thus, whereas a behaviourist view of language acquisition seeks to explain progress purely in terms of what happens outside the learner, the nativist view emphasizes Iearner-internal factors. A third view, however,is tenable. This treats the acquisition of language as the result of aninteraction between the learner's mental abilities and the linguisticenvironment. The learner's processing mechanisms both determine andare determined by the nature of the input. Similarly, the quality of theinput affects and is affected by the nature of the internal mechanisms.The interaction between external and internal factors is manifest in theactual verbal interactions in which the learner and his interlocutorparticipate. It follows from this interactionist view of languageacquisition that the important data are not just the utterances producedby the learner, but the discourse which learner and caretaker jointlyconstruct. Three different views regarding the role of input in languagedevelopment have been discussed. The behaviourist view emphasizes theimportance of the linguistic environment, which is treated in terms ofstimuli and feedback. The nativist view minimizes the role of the inputand explains language development primarily in terms of the learner'sinternal processing mechanisms. The interactionist view sees languagedevelopment as the result both of input factors and of innatemechanisms. Language acquisition derives from the collaborative effortsof the learner and his interlocutors and involves a dynamic interplaybetween external and internal factors.
    The discussion of the role of the linguistic environment in SLA whichis the main purpose of this chapter is conducted largely within theinteractionist framework. However, many of the early studies of inputand interaction concerned the acquisition of a first language rather thana second language. The next section, therefore, looks at the way motherstalk to young children.
    'Motherese' and L1 acquisition
    The first challenge to the prevailing nativist views occurred in firstlanguage acquisition research. Gradually during the 1970s a consider-able bulk of empirical research was built up which investigated howmothers talked to their children (e.g. Snow and Ferguson 1977;Waterson and Snow 1978). As this research served both as a model forsimilar research in SLA and has also been drawn on directly in justifyingsome theories of SLA (e.g. Krashen 1981a), it is important to considerthe major findings. These are summarized below.1 The nature of 'motherese' Much of the early research into the mother's language was concerned with identifying its linguistic properties in order to establish whetherinput data. On the other hand, the Iearner can be seen as 'a grandinitiator'; that is, he is equipped with just those abilities that are neededto discover the L2, no matter how impoverished the L2 data are. Also, ofcourse, there are intermediate positions in which the learner is seen asactively contributing to SLA, but dependent on the provision ofappropriate input. Behaviourist accounts of SLA view the learner as 'a language-producing machine'. The linguistic environment is seen as the crucialdetermining factor. In this model of learning, input comprises thelanguage made available to the learner in the form of stimuli and alsothat which occurs as feedback. In the case of the former, the learner'sinterlocutor models speafic forms and patterns which are internalizedby the learner imitating them. Thus the availability of suitable stimuli isan important determining faaor in SLA. Behaviourist theories emphasizethe need to regulate the stimuli by grading the input into a series of steps,so that each step constitutes the right level of difficulty for the level that the learner has reached. Feedback serves two purposes. It indicates when the L2 utterances produced by the learner are correct and so reinforcesthem, and it also indicates when the utterances are ill formed by correcting them. The regulation of the stimuli and the provision of feedback shape the learning that takes place and lead to the formation of habits.
    ……

    .......

    992457538
    1
    • 商品详情
    • 内容简介

    售后保障

    最近浏览

    猜你喜欢

    该商品在当前城市正在进行 促销

    注:参加抢购将不再享受其他优惠活动

    x
    您已成功将商品加入收藏夹

    查看我的收藏夹

    确定

    非常抱歉,您前期未参加预订活动,
    无法支付尾款哦!

    关闭

    抱歉,您暂无任性付资格

    此时为正式期SUPER会员专享抢购期,普通会员暂不可抢购